“Go Back to Where You Came From” Cited by EEOC as Discriminatory

As longtime labor and employment attorneys, we represent individuals from all backgrounds. Recently, amid internal strife within the Democratic party, President Donald Trump stirred a firestorm of controversy when he called out four far-left Congresswomen (AKA “The Squad”), directing them to “go back” to the countries from which they/their ancestors came.national origin discrimination lawyer Los Angeles

The exact phrase used within his series of tweets was:

“Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came.”

The issue is not the fact that the president has some folks in an uproar, as this is nothing new.

EEOC Considers Comments in This Vein Evidence of Racial Discrimination

What our Los Angles racial discrimination employment lawyers can say is this:

Far in advance of this maelstrom, the federal agency responsible for enforcement of anti-discriminatory employment laws expressly noted a phrase very similar and in the same vein as that shared by the president, noting it to be the type of language that might violate federal anti-discrimination employment laws.

The U.S. Equal Opportunity Commission (EEOC) expressly indicates the phrase, “Go back to where you came from,” as an utterance that could be used as evidence (potentially strong evidence) of race-based discrimination in employment. This is illegal in the context of employment law.

The EEOC points out on its website that ethnic slurs and/or other verbal/physical conduct on the basis of one’s nationality are against the law if they are:

  • Severe
  • Pervasive
  • Create a working environment that is offensive, hostile or intimidating;
  • Interfere with work performance;
  • Negatively impact workplace opportunities.

The EEOC goes on to list several examples of epithets, taunts and insults, ranging from mocking a person’s accent to remarks such as “Go back to where you came from.”‘

Such comments are characterized as a type of workplace harassment on the basis of one’s national origin. It may also be interpreted as condemnation for one’s ethnic, religious or religious identity as well.

However, it’s worth noting this is not necessarily an apples-to-apples comparison, as the president is not the employer of the Congresswomen against whom the verbal attack was launched. Rather, they belong to two parts of three separate but equal branches of government. The House did vote on a resolution to formally condemn the president’s words.

House Condemns Presidents Remarks – a Centennial First

Democratic members of Congress have been vocal in their condemnation of the president’s use of a similar phrase. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-VA (Hillary Clinton’s 2016 running mate) called the word’s “bigoted.”

For the first time in more than 100 years, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to formally rebuke a sitting U.S. president, finding he had increased and legitimized hatred and fear of new Americans as well as people of color living among us.

It should be noted that each of the Congresswomen is a U.S. citizen, and all but one were born in the U.S. The fourth was born in Somolia, came to the U.S. as a child and is now a naturalized citizen. Also naturalized citizens are Trump’s wife and First Lady, Melania, as well as his first wife, Ivanna, and paternal grandparents, from Germany. (His maternal grandparents are from Scotland and did not emigrate.)

Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. Call 714-937-2020.

Additional Resources:

Federal Law Says ‘Go Back To Where You Came From’ Counts As Discrimination, July 15, 2019, By Sanjana Karanth, The Huffington Post